A Critique of Frye’s, Jordan’s, and Miller’s Feminist Theories Essay Example for Free

A Critique of Fryes, Jordans, and milling machines Feminist Theories EssayMarilyn Fryes feminist theory is based on a combine of art and philosophy as well as a saluteation of her own ideas in the context of use of the world. Fryes theory stresses among other things, the fact that the power of feminism is embedded in the capability of do womens lives and their experiences understood by a vast majority of the people (Frye, 1983). On the other hand, Jordans feminist theory lays emphasis on the cleaning ladys self with reference to her congeneral offbeat (Jordan, 1991). Closely related to this, Millers theory is based on the linear perspective that thither is lease to address womens experiences and make the world understand them infract. Thus, Miller suggests that in order to understand women, there is require to understand their lives and values (Miller, 1987 Davis, 1999). This paper will examine and appraise the aforementi hotshotd theories and draw a conclusion based o n the flaws or incongruence depicted by the theories, and will therefore suggest whether the theories force out be used unneurotic or as separate entities. Fryes Feminist TheoryFrye affirms that in order to understand women fully, that is in terms of their feelings, motivations, ambitions and how they atomic number 18 likely to react to different situations, there is direct to understand their driving forces, which atomic number 18 the determining factors in various responses (Frye, 1983). Fryes feminist theory thus presents an attempt to explain the forces and how they apply to different women. While it may be true that there are deciding forces behind every womans response to different situations, it is likewise evident that the forces cannot be studied conclusively.This viewpoint is instigated by the fact that women live in different conditions, and these conditions are likely to refer how they react to different circumstances. Thus, a generalization cannot be used to des cribe womens attitudes. In view of sex and sexuality, Frye notes that sex roles occupy inhibited men and women from being in charge of their choices since the activities involved in sex are already predetermined (Hoagland Frye 2000). However, this supposition fails to address the sex drives involved among same-sex partners.Thus, even though Frye notes that women are sexually oppressed, it is difficult to concur with the argument since sexual freedom has increased tremendously in the world over the past few years. Fryes likening of women to a bird hencoop in which if one observes one wire of the cage, she or he is likely not to see the other wires present in the cage (Davis, 1999) presents an interesting point of discussion. This is true given that in there are instances when women are ignored, for example in restaurants when waiters expect men in company of women to pay the bills.This implies that much attention is paid to men, who are comprehend to be a superior sex. Jordans Fem inist Theory This theory emphasizes the connections among different aspects of womens lives, which are developed through and through relationships. It dwells on factors such as sexism and heterosexism, which separate women and alienate them from the rest of the society, thus subjecting them to a lot of suffering (Jordan, 1991). In view of this, while it is true that women are more affected by issues that mend sex it is also imperative to note that such issues are not just express to women.Concisely, men also suffer from issues related to sex. Jordans theory also dwells on the self-condition of women in relation to their relational wellbeing. Jordan emphasizes that most Western psychological theories tend to point too much on the womans self rather than her relations with others (Jordan, 1997). Along this line, Jordan asserts that men have subordinated women and view them as their subjects, thereby undermining womens relation capacity. This presumption has some substance with refer ence to how women were treated in the past.However, it may complimentary significance in the contemporary world where women have taken more leadership positions and have better control of their undertakings. Jordan addresses desire by relating it to adolescent sexuality, noting that it arises from peoples integration with others and creation of relationships (Jordan, 1997). This is true in the context of what people commonly refer to as real love that develops between men and women through their continued association. On the other hand, since relationships commonly break, there is an indication of a flaw in Jordans theory.Nevertheless, Jordans point of challenging the tendency by men to be dominant over women (Jordan, 1991) stresses the need for equality between men and women. Millers Feminist Theory Miller focuses on the concern of mens domination over women and their tendency to subordinate them (Miller, 1987). She asserts that the propensity by men to be dominant over women caus es conflict between the two sexes because men fail to understand women. Miller also notes that in dealing with conflict, women, who are usually the subordinates revert to overt conflict, a phenomenon that is prevalent in the present day (Miller, 1987).Miller therefore questions why men should be dominant over women yet women have equal capabilities do what men can do. Millers feminist theory is important in addressing gender disparity in the world. It also supports women in having voices to do what pleases them irrespective of what men think around them. However, its flaw lies in the fact that it fails to address why men have higher propensity to be dominant over women and why women usually revert to overt conflict when dealing with men. Conclusion The feminist theories by Frye, Jordan and Miller all address issues that though not congruent are intimately related.Fryes theory is bear on on understanding women Jordans theory recognizes the womans self cost and the importance of w omens participation in relations whereas Millers theory in centered on understanding women and why men should not treat them as subordinates. All these issues are closely related since they address the status of women and their role in the society, which is paramount in eliminating injustices against them. Hence the theories should treated together to achieve the objective. References Davis, F. (1999).Moving the mountain The womens movement in America since 1960 Chicago University of Illinois Press Frye, M. (1983). government activity of reality Essays on feminist theory. New York Ten Speed Press Frye, M. (1992). Willful Virgin Essays in Feminism, 1976-1992. New York The Crossing Press, Inc. Hoagland, S. L. Frye M. (2000). Feminist interpretations of Mary Daly. Pennsylvania Penn State Press Jordan, J. (1991). Womens growth in connection New York Guilford Publications, Inc Jordan, J. (1997). Womens growth in diversity. New York Guilford Press Miller, J. (1987). Toward a new psycho logy of women. Boston, MA Beacon.